Officials in Hong Kong have detained thirteen people on suspicion of involuntary manslaughter related to the recent catastrophic blaze, amid increasing public outcry over the arrests of citizens demanding responsibility.
Emergency services persisted in combing through the seven-building complex of the Wang Fuk Court residential area in Tai Po on Monday, days after the most fatal blaze in seven and a half decades. The number of fatalities reached 151 and is anticipated to climb higher as the search continues. About forty people are currently missing.
The housing complex, home to nearly 5,000 people, had been in the midst of extensive renovations that have been linked to the fire’s cause. In the aftermath, anger has escalated over reported past safety violations by the contractor working at the location and lax enforcement of standards, fuelled by revelations that residents had been complaining about the work for a year.
On Monday afternoon, officials said the anti-graft agency had arrested thirteen people over the disaster so far, including the executives and an engineering consultant of a construction company, and had “immediately begun a thorough probe along the lines of involuntary manslaughter”.
A top administrator stated that 7 of twenty tested samples of the mesh netting used around the buildings did not meet fire-retardant standards. Initial testing had found samples were compliant, but the official said the less expensive, substandard material had been installed in areas difficult to access in order to avoid discovery, labeling it a “deplorable deed”.
“Their sole aim was to make money at the expense of people’s lives,” he said.
As accusations of safety violations grow, alongside revelations that government authorities had issued several apparently unenforced warnings, residents have questioned why no officials have yet been held accountable. Instead, two members of the public were allegedly arrested by security forces.
A person, named as a Hong Kong student, was detained over an internet appeal that made “four requests” for assured assistance for the victims and responsibility for those at to blame, including any negligent or culpable government officials.
Local media said the student was arrested for “seditious intention”. Law enforcement did not confirm the detention, saying only that they “will take actions according to the situation and in accordance with the legal framework”.
News outlets also covered the detention of a ex-local representative.
Asked about the detentions, the secretary of security said there had been “inaccurate comments online” that were aimed to undermine public security. “Therefore, we must take necessary steps, including law enforcement measures,” the official told a press conference. “Specifics of the operation cannot be revealed as they concern national security.”
On local online platforms, people condemned the detention of citizens. “State security must be prioritised even if the victims are still buried in the building,” said one.
Some commenters drew comparisons to mainland China. “The mainland, these crimes are called ‘picking quarrels and provoking trouble’,” said one commenter. “They are typically met with heavy sentences. Social order trumps everything.”
A different user said: “Now that we are following mainland China’s methods, by targeting the individual who asks questions, no one will dare to ask, and therefore Hong Kong’s governance will have no issues.”
The arrests followed advisories by security officials that they would take action against anyone considered to be exploiting the incident to stir up “anti-China” feelings.
Prior to the detentions, officials had already begun showing heightened sensitivity to the public reaction. Since the suppression of earlier protests, civilian gatherings have been strictly regulated. In the days following the fire, community volunteers rapidly established aid operations, with many individuals using cars and public transport to deliver mountains of garments, food and other essentials for the victims.
However, by evening, officers were monitoring the area, and public authorities eventually assumed control from the volunteer organisers.
The appeal over which the individual was allegedly arrested was launched on Friday evening. Its “four demands” mirrored the terminology of past campaigns but did not advocate political change.
The individual told reporters that he was only “proposing fundamental requests”.
“If these ideas are considered seditious or ‘transgressive’, then I believe I can’t predict the outcomes of any action any more, and I can only do what I truly believe is right,” he said.