The veteran filmmaker has evolved into beyond being a filmmaker; he represents an institution, a prolific creative force. Whenever he releases project heading for the PBS network, all desire a part of him.
The filmmaker completed “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he notes, wrapping up of his extensive publicity circuit that included numerous locations, dozens of preview events and innumerable conversations. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”
Happily Burns is a force of nature, as expressive in conversation as he is prolific during post-production. The veteran director has appeared at locations ranging from prestigious venues to popular podcasts to discuss a career-defining series: The American Revolution, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that occupied the past decade of his life and arrived currently through the public broadcasting service.
Comparable to methodical preparation in today’s rapid-consumption era, Burns’ latest project is defiantly traditional, evoking memories of historical documentary classics than the era of digital documentaries and podcast series.
However, for the filmmaker, who has built a career documenting American historical narratives covering diverse cultural topics, the nation’s founding is not just another subject but essential. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein the other day, and she agreed: we won’t work on a more important film Burns states by phone from New York.
Burns and his collaborators along with writer Geoffrey Ward drew upon numerous historical volumes plus archival documents. Dozens of historians, covering various ideological backgrounds, offered expert analysis along with leading scholars covering various specialties such as enslavement studies, Native American history and the British empire.
The style of the series will feel familiar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. Its distinctive style included methodical photographic exploration through archival photographs, generous use of period music with performers reading diaries, letters and speeches.
This period represented Burns built his legacy; a generation later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can attract any actor he chooses. Appearing alongside Burns at a recent event, the Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda observed: “When Ken Burns calls, you say ‘Yes.’”
The lengthy creation process provided advantages regarding scheduling. Sessions happened at professional facilities, in relevant places using online technology, a tool embraced during the pandemic. Burns explains the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who scheduled a brief window while in Georgia to perform his role as George Washington then continuing to other professional obligations.
Additional performers feature Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, established Hollywood talent, diverse creative professionals, multiple generations of actors, Samuel L Jackson, Michael Keaton, Tracy Letts, British and American talent, versatile character actors, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, plus additional notable names.
Burns adds: “Honestly, this could represent the finest ensemble gathered for any production. Their work is exceptional. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. I got so angry when somebody said, regarding the famous participants. I responded, ‘These are performers.’ They’re the finest actors in the world and they animate historical material.”
Still, the lack of surviving participants, visual documentation compelled the production to lean heavily on historical documents, combining personal accounts of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This allowed them to introduce audiences not only to the “bold-faced names” of that era plus numerous additional who are seminal to the story”, numerous individuals never even had a portrait painted.
Burns additionally pursued his particular enthusiasm for maps and spatial representation. “Maps fascinate me,” he notes, “and there are more maps in this film than in all the other films I’ve done combined.”
The production crew recorded at numerous significant sites across North America and British sites to capture the landscape’s character and collaborated substantially with historical interpreters. Various aspects converge to tell a story more violent, complex and globally significant than the one taught in schools.
The documentary argues, transcended provincial conflict over land, taxation and representation. Instead the film portrays a blood-soaked struggle that ultimately drew in more than two dozen nations and surprisingly represented termed “the noble aspirations of humankind”.
Initial complaints and protests directed toward Britain by colonial residents across thirteen rebellious territories soon descended into a vicious internal war, dividing communities and households and neighbour against neighbour. In one segment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The greatest misconception concerning independence struggle is that it was something a unifying experience for colonists. This ignores the truth that it was a civil war among Americans.”
In his view, the independence account that “generally is overwhelmed by emotionalism and wistful remembrance and lacks depth and insufficiently honors the historical reality, all contributors and the extensive brutality.
It was, he contends, an uprising that declared the transformative concept of the unalienable rights of people; a bloody domestic struggle, separating rebels and supporters; plus an international conflict, another installment in a sequence of struggles among European powers for control of the continent.
The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the